Anslem Oshionebo

Blog

Corporate Intelligence: Why Counterparty Due Diligence Matters

Anslem Oshionebo, CEO of Tenaza Asset Recovery & Intelligence, on why businesses should investigate counterparties before they sign, lend or invest.

By Anslem Oshionebo 3 min read

Corporate Intelligence by Anslem Oshionebo

Many of the debts we recover at Tenaza Asset Recovery & Intelligence could have been avoided with better due diligence at the start. A lender, supplier or investor who knows who they are dealing with makes better decisions and has stronger options if things go wrong.

What corporate intelligence covers

  • Identity and ownership: who really owns and controls the company, including beneficial owners behind nominees.
  • Track record: litigation history, insolvency, regulatory sanctions and past disputes.
  • Reputation: media coverage, industry standing and integrity concerns.
  • Assets: what the counterparty owns that could support a claim if it defaults.
  • Connections: related parties, politically exposed persons and sanctioned entities.

When to do it

Before large loans, joint ventures, acquisitions, distribution agreements, major supplier contracts and any deal where a counterparty failure would hurt. The depth should match the risk.

Red flags

  • Opaque ownership or frequent changes of directors.
  • Registered addresses that do not match operations.
  • Inconsistent financial information or unwillingness to provide it.
  • History of disputes with lenders or partners.
  • Pressure to close quickly without normal checks.

Intelligence across borders

Information sits in different registries, courts and languages across countries. Tenaza's network across more than 40 countries and its AI tools let us connect those records quickly, lawfully and with evidence that holds up.

Levels of due diligence

  • Basic screening: company registry checks, sanctions and politically exposed person screening, adverse media searches. Suitable for low-risk suppliers.
  • Enhanced due diligence: beneficial ownership tracing, litigation and insolvency searches, financial analysis and reputation checks. Suitable for significant partners and customers.
  • Investigative due diligence: discreet source enquiries, site visits and asset verification. Suitable for acquisitions, joint ventures and high-value or high-risk transactions.

A case pattern

A company considers a joint venture with a local partner that claims strong government relationships and existing assets. Registry checks show the company is properly incorporated. Enhanced checks reveal that the ultimate owner is related to an official involved in awarding contracts, that the claimed assets are subject to a dispute, and that a previous partner sued over unpaid amounts. The deal could have created corruption exposure and financial losses. Due diligence costing a small fraction of the investment prevented both.

Building it into the process

Due diligence works best when it is a standard step, not an afterthought. Define risk tiers for counterparties, the checks required for each tier and who approves exceptions. Refresh checks periodically for long-term relationships, because ownership and reputations change.

A leader's view: make due diligence a habit, not a reaction

Most organisations commission due diligence after something has already gone wrong: a supplier disappears, a partner is named in the press, a payment is frozen by a bank. By then, the cost is far higher than the check would have been. Leaders change this by making due diligence part of how decisions are made, not a favour requested from compliance at the last minute.

Three practical steps make the difference. First, write a short policy that sets risk tiers and the checks required for each, so teams know what is expected without negotiating every case. Second, build the time into deal timelines; a week of enhanced checks is rarely the reason a good deal fails. Third, ask for the findings in a one-page summary: who owns the company, what red flags exist, what was verified and what remains uncertain. Executives make better decisions when the risk is presented clearly.

In cross-border work, local knowledge is decisive. Registry data in many markets is incomplete or out of date, and reputations are often known locally long before they appear online. That is why correspondent networks and on-the-ground verification remain essential, even as data tools improve. The goal is simple: know who you are dealing with before you commit money, reputation or people.

A small cost, a large saving

Due diligence costs a fraction of a bad debt. The best recovery is the one that never needs to happen.

Common questions

What is counterparty due diligence?

Verifying the identity, ownership, reputation, financial standing and integrity of a business partner, customer or supplier before entering a relationship.

When is enhanced due diligence needed?

For high-value transactions, joint ventures, acquisitions, high-risk jurisdictions and counterparties linked to politically exposed persons.